Sounds cool! We're talking about asynchronous work. And now many people who work remotely, are having arguments for and against asynchronous work. What do you think about it? Why have you chosen it?
I think this works for when you've got a very well defined artifact. You've got a piece of code, it's put down, someone can pick up and interrogate it, add, etc. But I think there's nuance, live collaboration moments are very important to actually interact with the humans on the other side of the ideas. So I think it's really about choosing the function in the business and then assigning the type of collaboration that is best suited for that function.
For example, strategy or campaign development — is great in person. When I say in person, I mean live. And then production work is better asynchronously, because what tends to happen is that you need to do a deep dive into details and come back. People need to go do investigations, find facts, and come back.
I've seen that you've been working in Over for a year now. Did you work remotely before or not?
Most of my career — no. My background is with big advertising firms and when you come from an industry that is built around this mentality of billing clients per hour...not much remote. They tend to put a huge amount of emphasis on face-to-face meetings and presence in meetings. It seems to quantify the value of the contract instead of the quality of the outputs. In the last two years, I've been working for more product-centric companies, startups, and so remote working is quite new to me, a revelation in terms of productivity and also the work-life balance that it provides.
It's been interesting for me in terms of finding everyone has different moments in the day where they are more energized and more productive. Being able to plan your working day around them is incredible. Also, in creative businesses, it's incredibly important to constantly gather new stimuli and the ability to do something as simple as just go for a walk somewhere and stop and work when the moment takes you.
And what about hiring people? What's most important here? Soft skills or hard skills?
Would you hire someone who was not so good at hard skills, but a really good communicator, with a collaborative spirit or vice versa?
I think being fully remote places more emphasis on the soft skills.
We hire very much for culture, because particularly when you are running a fully remote business that is critical to keep the culture healthy. When you place a huge amount of trust on everyone, culture fit is critical. So one of our values we are refer to as "Is takes a village". We give everyone a huge amount of freedom and equal responsibility. We trust everyone to go off and do what they need to do, but equally, they're responsible for delivering what they're going to do.
You absolutely have to be world-class at your skillset, but how you conduct yourself and how you fit into your culture is critical. When you don't have physical space you can't read the nuances of tone on someone's face, you have to be clear communicators.
We place a huge amount of emphasis on a direct feedback culture as well. We give a lot of feedback constantly to each other. Being able to do that in a very respectful, open, honest, candid, and caring way is critical. So we think about all these things in the context of having a remote culture.
So how do you can identify culture while being remote, never seeing, for example, some of your coworkers in real life?
Well, my colleague Shawn referenced this the other day, the idea that culture, is your six week average of your behavior.
How you identify a culture in businesses is through the acts that we take. It was easier for us to just sit in a room and talk, but that excludes an individual's contribution. So we're not going to do that. We all act if we are all fully remote.
So it's small little things like that.
In terms of identifying cultural fit within people, we just have a robust interview process. We have a technical skills assessment and then we can have up to three or four culture interviews, where you would meet diverse people from cross-functional positions of the business. We probe and really try to get to know the person and see if there is a values connection.
I feel like the interview process takes quite long with all of these steps.
Yes, it is quite long. We know that, but it's so critical to get the right people. Not only because of being remote, but we also have this trust as the default, as a way of working.
Basically, that's all from my questions.
I saw you've got a great e-book on the site now. So you're essentially producing another one. On what exact focus areas?
The exact area right now is how remote established companies hire. We want to show the success story of where they hire, how they hire, how much do they pay, etc. This has been a huge investment to analyze.
We'd love to be a showcase for remote companies. We're very open and transparent! So we're happy to help you with whatever.